Hi wasoxigen, thank you for jumping in with an open mind.
- I suspect that many in your audience think you have sentimental reasons for believing what you do.
Don't we all feel emotional about death, particularly of the death of those humans or pets we've become attached to? I've just expanded my circle of compassion to include those that I happened to not meet, like the original post tries to explain. I fail to understand what's the problem about being sentimental about unnecessary unjust cruelty. That's what we're discussing here. All the unnecessary suffering that we chose to contribute to because of our trained, selective discrimination against certain species.
But if the emotional appeal doesn't work for you, there are plenty of scientific reasons to stop using animal products. The main ones being how much animal production contributes to depletion of resources, pollution and climate change. I won't even mention the health benefits.
- The fly vs. dolphin question seems like a good one to clarify values.
- If I had the power to eradicate all flies, I would consider it.
- I will point out that I am a human, and more concerned with human welfare than the welfare of other creatures.
- ...and partly a belief that humans are capable of suffering more acutely than many other living things.
- What values inform your position? [...] By the time you learned to read, you had certainly annihilated vast numbers of microorganisms.
- The plants and bugs in your organic garden are engaged in a vicious, thoughtless war for survival, with violence and chemical warfare regular features of their ordinary existence.
- You recognize that we humans are special, in that we are capable of making informed choices about how we interact with our environment and affect other forms of life.
- Yet the "web of life" diagram is a random jumble of living things, with no acknowledgement that single-celled organisms are incapable of suffering, or that humans have no natural predators.
- If "every living thing is valuable," how do you decide what to eat out of necessity? What is the value you wish to maximize?
A simple exercise I suggest is to put yourself in the body of others and imagine how you'd feel to live the lives they endure. Then ask yourself, do I need this to sustain me or am I taking this life for personal indulgence? If you answer honestly, and take the victim's point of view into consideration (like the original post points out) you'll find your value.
In essence, do to others like you'd like done to you, is not that new or radical idea.