The lack of a positive doesn't make something morally wrong. The "trust" thing is a rather weak argument. I think society would continue to function if disabled people were "euthanized." Societies in the past have. Besides, what if it's a genetic disability that I'll never get? Then I don't have to worry. Um, that sounds like a Utilitarian argument that we should kill permanently disabled people to me. How do you think eating animals makes vegans feel? Sorry, my arguments are somewhat aggressive. I should clarify: I'm not attacking you. I'm certainly not defending animal abuse or forced euthanasia. I'm not even defending vegetarianism. I think there are plenty of good arguments against it…I just don't buy your ethical system.Can you state a positive thing that comes from animal abuse?
-You can't trust a society that will off you if you ever end up disabled
A society works best when all it's members are in a healthy mental, emotional, and physical state.
How do you think killing the disabled effects their mothers, their families?