a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment
briandmyers  ·  3891 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: An interesting question

    The minimum wage is already zero. That is how much someone earns if they choose not to work or can’t find a job.

This is a dishonest re-definition. A wage is what you must pay, as an employer, if you wish to employ people. A wage is not "what you don't earn when you don't work".

Minimum wage is there simply to prevent the type of abuse that is possible by employers when/if people are very desperate for work. It is a restriction on employers. It is no more coercive than myriad other taxes; I see no difference. No one likes taxes; that's not a good enough reason to eliminate them.

I'll read your links and respond more later probably; busy week :-)

[edit] It appears to me that your argument is exactly the same as an argument calling for zero taxes, on employers at least. ANY extra expense might keep an employer from employing someone, therefore it's wrong. Your argument devolves into "all taxes on employers are wrong".