So are you saying there doesn't exist a constitutional right to privacy? I find myself having to agree, especially after reading that article, because there is no constitutionally explicit "right to privacy" -- only "certain specific constitutional provisions which are designed in part to protect privacy at certain times and places with respect to certain activities" (Justice Black, referring to the specifically delineated rights provided by the Bill of Rights). And if you are saying there doesn't exist a constitutional right to privacy (only this very judicial-activism happy push for privacy), what should we do? We all agree we enjoy our privacy, but this staunch originalist is saying it doesn't exist in our Constitution. The only protections we have come from liberal Justices but they're not, strictly speaking, constitutional. Is the alternative an amendment? What would it look like? How would you define the privacy we should all be afforded?