followed tags: 15
followed domains: 0
badges given: 0 of 0
member for: 1382 days
Russia historically has close ties to Serbia, which would explain their reluctance to acknowledge Serbian involvement in a Genocide.
I doubt we'd see any significant regime change with the path that China is on right now. Generally political systems are fairly stable when either on the more authoritarian or the more democratic side. It's in the middle where instability is most prevalent (called an anocracy). I'd expect that only if China starts to reform its political system to be more democratic that we'd see significant unrest calling for a regime change, and China is currently reluctant to do so.
However, as Youwei notes in "The End of Reform in China" (Foreign Affairs May/June 2015), China is starting to run out of areas it can reform without becoming less authoritarian.
- [M]ost easy reforms have already been launched. Revamping agriculture, encouraging entrepreneurship, promoting trade, tweaking social security—all these have created new benefits and beneficiaries while imposing few costs on established interests. What is left are the harder changes, such as removing state monopolies in critical sectors of the economy, privatizing land, giving the National People’s Congress power over fiscal issues, and establishing an independent court system. Moving forward with these could begin to threaten the hold of the Chinese Communist Party on power, something that the regime is unwilling to tolerate.
I'm having the weird experience of having my first grown-up job right now (I'm nearly 19) field managing a campaign for mayor in my city. It's a weird experience, but it's definitely changing the way I see myself.
It confused me too, as that's what I expected the gender problem to be. That being said, I felt like it'd be a bit dishonest to post the article without the full title.
Before anything else, learn some basic logic and critical thinking. It makes finding the argument of a passage, as well as its strengths and weaknesses significantly easier. Patrick J. Hurley's "A Concise Introduction to Logic" is the book I used, and if you get an older edition you can get it for really cheap.
After that, it really depends on what you want out of philosophy. It's a really big subject, so it'd be hard to give you a good reading list without knowing what exactly interests you. There's philosophy of science, medicine, history, religion, etc., political philosophy, and basically every other combination of an academic subject + philosophy, and more.
It's such a fast read, and it's a great introduction to Marxist thought. However, it should not be taken as the foundational text of Marxism. It's a platform written for a particular political party. That said, it's still a great piece of work.