a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by JakobVirgil

I think it could be worth a read. Ken Arrow, John Nash and Vilfredo Pareto have wonderful math based on bullshit axioms.

but I think I can buy that anything can be modeled as long as it does not turn into "anything can be modeled = this model is correct."





b_b  ·  4348 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Numerical solutions = never "correct"

JakobVirgil  ·  4348 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Not just the solutions but the models themselves are incorrect i.e. they don't describe what they claim to describe.

b_b  ·  4348 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Even if the model is reasonable, a numeric solution is only applicable to this case, with these boundary/initial conditions, with this level of accuracy. Change anything and it falls apart.