a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by user-inactivated
user-inactivated  ·  1593 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: How to be happy? Most people have it backwards.

Because it's as aesthetically pleasing as it is functional or because our familiarity with its themes offers an air of authority and legitimacy?

I dunno. This is news to me. Honestly. I kind of find it hard to see how a philosophy with a core tenant of "think for yourself" can, if taken seriously, be married to "thought movements" or "philosophical trends."

Maybe I misunderstand stoicism.

Edit:

    Judge yourself entitled to any word or action which is in accord with nature, and do not let any subsequent criticism or persuasion talk you out of it. No, if it was a good thing to say or do, do not revoke your entitlement. Those others are guided by their own minds and pursue their own impulses. Do not be distracted by any of this, but continue straight ahead, following your own nature and universal nature: these two have one and the same path.

Meditations 5:3

I mean, I don't agree with that whole statement, because I think it leaves room for people to be tempted by their own egos and idle fancies, but it's definitely a call for independence. Maybe I don't understand Stoicism, but maybe others don't as well . . .





kleinbl00  ·  1593 days ago  ·  link  ·  

The issue is not that you misunderstand stoicism, it's that you misunderstand "thought movements." I mean, Trump was railing against fascism yesterday. "that which you do" and "that which you say you do" need not be aligned in the slightest.

user-inactivated  ·  1593 days ago  ·  link  ·  

    "that which you do" and "that which you say you do" need not be aligned in the slightest.

I don't understand. They totally do.

Edit: Wait, I get it. You mean in regards to thought movements, not Stoicism.