It's an archetypal Libertarian screed: "I acknowledge that there is a problem, I acknowledge that there is a solution, but as the problem doesn't impact me at all while the solution inconveniences me a little, it is my right as a Maker to demonstrate the inferiority of the Takers by arguing using tortured logic that if they were at all fit they would already be calling the shots therefore make way for my Free Market Economy."
He's getting all the shit he deserves.
We always ask why we don't see women in top leadership positions, but we never ask why we
see so many men in these jobs.
this man has literally never read any of the most basic literature on the subject. It's entirely about "men prioritize this because SOCIETY, women prioritize this because SOCIETY, therefore equality involves changing that society."