a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by mk

    According to the bank’s own analysis, employees opened roughly 1.5 million deposit accounts that may not have been authorized by consumers. Employees then transferred funds from consumers’ authorized accounts to temporarily fund the new, unauthorized accounts. This widespread practice gave the employees credit for opening the new accounts, allowing them to earn additional compensation and to meet the bank’s sales goals. Consumers, in turn, were sometimes harmed because the bank charged them for insufficient funds or overdraft fees because the money was not in their original accounts.

    According to the bank’s own analysis, Wells Fargo employees applied for roughly 565,000 credit card accounts that may not have been authorized by consumers. On those unauthorized credit cards, many consumers incurred annual fees, as well as associated finance or interest charges and other fees.

$100M is far too low. That's less than $50 per fraudulent account. They should be fined at least $2B. Each customer that had a fraudulent account created in their name should be paid a minimum of $1000. It's a pretty serious offense.





user-inactivated  ·  2771 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Fine them the profits they made on the fraud, then a multiplier based on how "WTF" the act was. And if they shredded evidence, then jail them for obstruction.

Hubbington  ·  2767 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I agree, this fine is pretty much a slap on the wrist.