a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by cliffelam
cliffelam  ·  4440 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: My Month With a Gun: Week One

So, you've never been to a gun show, yeah? The tables are almost exclusively dealers, for various reasons. I've only been to gun shows in NC, SC, CA, VA, TX, TN, MA, and FL, so there may be shows that aren't that way, but I'd be surprised.

But, again, look at the transfer numbers, non-FFL transactions are very very small.

So the reason those polls are ambiguous is that people think (a) it's a serious problem that will (b) make a difference. If you phrased it differently you'd get a different answer.

-XC





ecib  ·  4440 days ago  ·  link  ·  

    So the reason those polls are ambiguous is that people think (a) it's a serious problem that will (b) make a difference.

I think this is an assumption.

    If you phrased it differently you'd get a different answer.

Sure, I already pointed this out. But the key takeaway is no matter how you phrase it (without actively trying to spin the poll), you get a clear majority wanting increased background checks.

    • Quinnipiac University poll, March 26-April 1, 2013. "Do you support or oppose requiring background checks for all gun buyers?" Support: 91 percent. Oppose: 8 percent.

Fairly unambiguous, but if you drill down:

    "If the buyer is trying to purchase a gun from another person who is not a gun dealer but owns one or more guns and wants to sell one of them." Favor: 70 percent. Oppose: 29 percent.

Still a clear majority. And this doesn't even speak to gun shows. This involves two private citizens making a sale to each other.

People aren't misunderstanding the question here. This isn't that tricky. The poll isn't asking if people think that it will solve a serious problem. Part of the reason this might enjoy such large support is because people perceive it as a small "no-brainer" that might only chip away but should be done nonetheless. That's a guess like your guess. What we do know is that people favor some form of increased gun control. Overwhelmingly.

cliffelam  ·  4440 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Huh, I had not seen that second one.

That first one is completely useless. Is it asked before the second one?

I am always reminded of the "Ban Bi-Hydrogen Oxide" stuff.

Side note: it's not increased gun control, it's control of the transfer process.

-XC

ecib  ·  4440 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I think this seems to be a collection of polls rather than one poll with multiple questions. They seem to have a lot of different sources according to the article. It gives the language of each question, but also who polled as I read it.

cliffelam  ·  4440 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I talked to a friend who dug into it and he said his main argument was that it was not geographically diverse. Which makes sense.