a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by user-inactivated
user-inactivated  ·  4125 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: FBI to ACLU: Nope, we won't tell you how, when, or why we track you

Spying loses most of its secrecy when the warrant becomes involved.





user-inactivated  ·  4124 days ago  ·  link  ·  

But then they could spy on everyone.

user-inactivated  ·  4124 days ago  ·  link  ·  

And they do, to an extent. The famous CC cameras in London, etc.

Honestly, you'll find I think that I'm way, way to the extreme end of this debate. You're more moderate, and most people of course agree with you. So it goes.

user-inactivated  ·  4124 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Why do you think it's better to sacrifice privacy for security?

user-inactivated  ·  4124 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I have both. I lead an extremely private life, rarely interact with the government, and live in one of the safest places on Earth.

user-inactivated  ·  4124 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Well... okay, but without a warrant, doesn't that mean that the government has unlimited power as to how they spy on you? They can read your emails, or perhaps listen to your phone calls, as a warrant allows an authority to violate liberties, yet warrants also limit the liberties that can be violated. If the saying goes that "you have the right to remain silent" because what you say can be used as evidence in a court, surely that the FBI is able to do this is bad?

user-inactivated  ·  4124 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Yeah. And in some cases there are clear limits on what the FBI should be able to do ... but again, I don't really mind if the FBI scans my emails for keywords - they won't find any. As far as limiting their power does go, however, I'd much rather err on the side of security than on that of privacy. A 50/50 balance, while ideal, is impossible.

user-inactivated  ·  4124 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Hmm.