1) Active Listening. The conscious choice to sit and listen. We put a record on, sit in a chair, and listen. Usually from speakers - maybe some people prefer headphones. But it is a choice. Sitting and listening is the activity. Maybe you looked at liner notes and artwork, but the sensory experience of listening is the primary activity. 2) Passive listening. The casual choice to listen while doing something else. It's music in the background while you clean, read, work out, rest, etc. Technology has made passive listening so inexpensive and convenient. It is possible to listen to relatively high quality music 24 hours a day. The thing that has been on my mind is, does anyone actively listen anymore? I do, but it is a lot less frequent than it used to be. That has a lot to do with family and employment responsibilities, but I still find it interesting to think about. Has the convenience of listening taken away from the experience of listening to music? It's arguable that the same concept applies to films as well. Because of the developments in home theater technology and DVRs, people may not sit down and watch a film (or TV show) in its entirety. It's easy to pause it and grab a snack, go to the bathroom, or even resume it the next day, as opposed to "being stuck" watching in a theater. Is it a good thing? is it a bad thing? I know the author was really talking about analog vs. digital... but at some point it needs to be acknowledged that a large portion of the population can't even discern between a decent MP3 or AAC encoding and a CD or even vinyl, let alone 16-bit vs. 24-bit sound. And an even smaller portion of the population cares. -end ramble