It's interesting what you think "common problems" are and the assumptions you make as to the solutions. I'll answer (1) such that a perspective into the vastly differing make-up of social and psychological profiles can be seen, then explain. 1) Castigate him for not leaving the other kid worse off, demand to know why he didn't see it through to the end, then ask him why he's confident enough in himself to wear a bracelet that provokes an ass-kicking but not confident enough to have his dad know who he is. But it wouldn't happen unless someone else had been raising my kid. I grew up in rural New Mexico in a peculiar little town with some history to it.. Said town is surrounded by abject poverty and violence. There's an element of Apartheid South Africa to it; everyone in town is white and has a Ph.D (two kids I went to high school with had parents with Nobel prizes) and everyone who cleans the bathrooms and restocks the grocery store shelves is brown and couldn't afford college (presuming they finished high school). The Espanola valley is one of the very few places in the United States that a white kid can experience prejudice; the consolation is that the Hispanics and the Indians hate each other more than they hate you. My grandparents lived in the Espanola valley from 1948 until their deaths last year. My father attended elementary school in the Valley until the tide of rising violence forced his parents to drive him the 30 miles to school every day (one of them worked as a phone operator for Los Alamos National Labs; the other was a union plumber who did some of the work on the nuke shots in Nevada). The experience was formative on him and, as a result, formative on me. I was watching an ABC Afterschool Special in 1st grade. My father, who had a habit of coming home for lunch at 1pm so he could drink 4 beers and sleep until 3 so he could go back to work until 7 or 8 and thus avoid my mother, observed Hammerman utter those famous words, "I'll see you after school." My father observed this with some interest, then said: If anyone ever says "i'll see you after school" to you, you say "no, you'll see me NOW" and you swing for his nose as hard as you can. And you don't worry about the pain when he hits you back, you keep hitting that kid until he's on the ground, and you don't stop until a teacher pulls you off. And you don't worry about getting sent to the office or anything like that, you make sure everybody knows that picking on you is too expensive to bother with because you want everyone around you trained before they start carrying knives. It was an interesting lesson, particularly in the context of pre-adolescent socialization. The typical "avoid trouble/learn to get along/trust in adults" mantra was completely absent, instead replaced with "and they shall know us by our trail of dead/if you're going to play, play for keeps". Further, it emphasized that if you are comfortable with violence and ready to accept the consequences (which, when you're seven, are virtually nil), you will automatically defeat those who are not. More than that, my mother taught at every alternative medicine school in Northern New Mexico. We were constantly surrounded by LGBT. I went to a lesbian wedding at nine. Being gay just wasn't a thing. I'd be far more worried about the empty sloganeering of a rainbow bracelet than I would by my son's sexuality; one wears colors because one has pride and any kid who will don the uniform but not come clean to his parents is a kid who has bigger secrets than his sexuality. I'd be far more concerned to see my daughter checking out The Fountainhead than I would seeing her check out other girls. So... right from the bat, your theoretical questions are simply alien to my experience. The rest of them, quickly: 2) I don't leave my laptop anywhere. 3) I'm not dating their friend and I'm not going to let them ruin my evening. 4) See (1). 5) I'll bet it slows me down. 6) Become an officer. 7) Why should I give them pie when I can simply walk away? * * * The problem with hypotheticals is they are never complete, and everyone who answers them fills in the missing pieces from their experience. A lot of yours touch on experiences I've been through, so they aren't thought-provoking, they're memory-provoking. In many cases they're null - between my sister and I high school involved about nine wrecks, three of which we were driving in, one of which involved ambulances, hospitalization and a six figure insurance settlement, and nobody did any crying. It can be a fun exercise, but in order for it to be open-ended enough to be applicable to a large enough cross-section it has to be vague and if it isn't vague, it's going to be irrelevant to a lot of people.
I assume by this statement that your father was probably in a few scraps. Admittedly immature, but I enjoy getting in a fight from time to time. I've had the shit beat out of me by way bigger dudes a couple time (being 5'8", 170lbs, its not very difficult to run across someone more imposing than I), but I've always found that in the moment you don't feel each punch. You're too focused on the task at hand; pain is not something to fear, and fear will only make you a terrible fighter. What hurts is the next day when your face is swollen and bruised, and you can't so much as blow your nose without wincing.And you don't worry about the pain when he hits you back
My father had a harder time of it. He was born an RH mismatch with his mother in deep rural NM and as a consequence had his growth permanently stunted. He barely made it to 5'7. I, on the other hand, am the product of recessive genetics and am the tallest person on either side of the family for at least three generations. So while he had to be a tough and eager scrapper in order to keep his nose clean, I generally didn't have to worry about anyone who wasn't at least a grade ahead. Which made adolescence somewhat delicious. There's nothing quite like having a former bully stare up at you from chest level.
I get that the questions don't pertain to you, but instead of saying that it wouldn't happen to you, why don't you entertain the thought that maybe it does? I mean it's like you took the fun out of the whole what if? factor. Being vague wouldn't be that thought provoking if you asked me.
I didn't say it wouldn't happen to me. I said it had happened to me and that the solution wasn't novel. Take the "your laptop has been compromised" thing - every time someone with a Yahoo account gets phished you stare down this very problem. "I'm writing this with tears in my eyes" is far more of a problem than "Disregard that I suck cocks" and I know five people who have been hit with that in the past year. It isn't thought-provoking, it's dreary routine. More than that, the reality of the dreary routine is far more interesting and far more variable than the hypothetical.
So these situations are normal routine for you? That must suck. While I understand that the questions might not pertain to you, it doesn't mean you should say they aren't thought provoking to others. Although that really does suck that these situations are normal for you. Ouch.
What I said was: A. " a perspective into the vastly differing make-up of social and psychological profiles can be seen." B. " in order for it to be open-ended enough to be applicable to a large enough cross-section it has to be vague and if it isn't vague, it's going to be irrelevant to a lot of people." C. " the reality of the dreary routine is far more interesting and far more variable than the hypothetical." So yeah. I find real situations to be more interesting than fabricated ones, primarily because when you fabricate a problem you can never fabricate all the facets that actually make the problem a real problem. And contrary to what you may think, I don't think it sucks that these situations are normal at all. I think it sucks far worse to be completely flummoxed by everyday occurrences that can be handled easily if one thinks about it a little. The problem I dealt with yesterday - and solved to my satisfaction - trumps the crap out of all of the above, in my opinion... not the least of which is the solution matters.
A. I understand that. I find that interesting. B. Not necessarily. Sure, it isn't going to be relevant for some people, but that doesn't mean that there will be a large number of people in that category. Also why would it matter whether or not it's applicable to a large group? It's not like they are doing a study or anything. C. Alright so that's your opinion. Mine is just the opposite. Sure you may not be able think of every facet that makes it a problem, but it's still fun to read what others would do in those situations and to write what you would do. I haven't seen anyone in this thread, nor know of anyone that would be flummoxed by everyday occurrences. Congrats on your problem being solved?