a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by mk
mk  ·  4571 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Hubski Update: Shout-outs
That's possible. However, maybe it might make sense to use #tagname# instead. But I'm not sure how often it would be used.




user-inactivated  ·  4571 days ago  ·  link  ·  
A stupid question maybe about the implementation: why would the markup not just be like in twitter: a simple @ or a simple #, instead of 2?
mk  ·  4571 days ago  ·  link  ·  
Not at all. I wanted to keep in line with the other markup. Having two +'s for bold or * for italics, but one @ for a shout-out seemed unbalanced. (And one plus for bold would lead to unintended bold type, I think.) Also, we aren't limited in characters, and two @'s seems so deliberate.

I guess I am taking a markup stance more than a messaging one. I did debate it though. A good argument can be made for both.

user-inactivated  ·  4571 days ago  ·  link  ·  
Makes sense. Thank you.