Prior to the debate Kennedy was polling at 15% in CNN’s own poll. Most polls have options listed as: Biden Trump Other Then, when you click on, “other,” you get: Kennedy Stein West When the poll is Biden Trump Kennedy Not surprisingly, Kennedy’s numbers are even higher. My assumption is that he is around 20% nationally, post debate. This will continue to inch up until the second debate. If Kennedy makes the stage, he can win. He held a shadow debate wherein he answered all of the same questions as the other candidates. It’s worth watching. You get to see all three answer:
Man, I dunno about that guy. You can perceive this as a hit job, but if I'm simply watching the video of RFK talking about the sexual assault allegations after Saagar brings it up, it's real bad. Real bad response to the questioning. No remorse, no openness. This, after I watched some of RFK's interview with Cenk on The Young Turks and almost fell asleep.
The guy is a recovered addict. At the outset of his campaign he let his team, and all of us know that he has a lot of skeletons in his closet. He has worked hard to reform them. Truth is, I don’t give a shit about his behaviors 20, 30, 40 years ago. I care about his current judgement and his policy proposals. Biden has sexual harassment charges from 40 years ago, trump has many. Wipe all of those away and look at their policy proposals, look at what they perceive to be the greatest challenges worth overcoming for our nation. I find it hard to believe anyone wouldn’t choose Kennedy’s vision for America. I’ve never watched Cenk’s program so I can’t speak to it but I’ve never found a long form interview with Kennedy to be boring. But we do live in a sound-bite world. Which is why lying and saying someone ate a dog in Korea can have legs. That Vanity Fair article was a steaming pile of propaganda.
thank goodness there are just as many if not more articles written by corporate media about the dangers of Hitler 2, this all seems very balanced
People don’t want a president with dementia. Not such a crazy notion. For every voter that doesn’t see trump as “hitler 2” (which is a very large number), the preference leans away from the guy with dementia. Of course, one can argue that he doesn’t actually have dementia, but if he doesn’t, he plays the part well enough.
Ronald Reagan has entered the chat No but you've made my point for me. Why do people not realize Trump is American Hitler? Because CNN et al is too busy calling for Hitler's rival to step down. Whether their primary motivation is fear of lawsuits, pursuit of tax breaks for the ruling class, or Axelrod's personal ideology is not terribly relevant, the result is the same. He doesn't even have dementia. He's old. Do you know anyone with dementia? I do. It's not something that comes and goes, and it's far worse than anything I've ever seen Joe do.
With he exception of FOX News, and even they’ve been more anti-trump the past year, every msm outlet has been very much reporting about the dangers of trump since 2016. The difference is, people don’t buy it. The media landscape has changed so much. People have figured out how it works. For example, he mentioned that if he isn’t elected there would be an economic bloodbath (as related to Chinese auto imports particularly) and the MSM just segmented the, “bloodbath,” part. Out of context it is scary stuff. They do this A LoT! To be clear, the right does this too. Recently Joe Biden looked like he was confused and couldn’t find a chair or that at worse he was defeating in his pants. The right had a field day online with this. People are disillusioned with the entire system. Our media has failed us. Our candidates are atrocious. Biden is not mentally fit for the job. I don’t care if it, “comes and goes.” Xi, Putin, Netanyahu and other leaders are sharp as a tack. We deserve the same. You couldn’t pay me to vote for Trump or Biden. I don’t think I will ever vote for another RNC or DNC candidate. I’m done. I will work hard to get a third party candidate elected. This cycle and beyond. All else is Stockholm syndrome. The parties are remarkably similar. Both run up the debt to unforgivable levels and rarely mention it as the threat that it is. We need to be rid of Citizens United. We need ranked choice. We need a cap on campaign spending. We need term limits in Congress. We need to dismantle the revolving door between private and public sector. For example, the head of the FDA during Covid is now on Pfizer's board. We are a mess and thinking either party will change that, or even wants to is ridiculous.
It's hard to really know what the context for the "bloodbath" comment was. I've seen the raw clip. After he says the "100% tariffs" bit, he then says "if we don't win, that'll be the least of it, it'll be a bloodbath for the whole country". Yes, the msm focuses far too much on small soundbites, but I can't really convince myself that they're in the tank for biden when there is a massive disconnect between economic indicators and crime statistics vs. perception of both. They have done a poor job of explaining the true threat of Trump, and the editorial decisions, especially with some of the headline selections and choice of stories to focus on, betray their poor grasp of history and overall naivete in this moment. And that's the best case scenario, unknowingly enabling fascism. We're not in a position to judge the mental acuity of fascist foreign regime leaders who meticulously control the information that is released about them via state media. I'd take a bumbling old man over a sharp (or whatever Trump is), aspiring fascist any day of the week. Insomuch as they're corrupt hyper-capitalists, agreed, but one demands a fascist oligarchy instead of a democratic oligarchy. I'm no lib, I'm an independent, probably socialist-dem, who feels that the most effective way to defeat the fascism element is voting dem right now. MAGA and the GOP will have to be politically vanquished completely before a new party can arise in our stupid-ass political system. Dismantling the oligarchy will require democracy. I agree with so much of what you've said, but at this moment, it is politically impossible to make a push for it. And I'm sorry, but obviously I don't think RFK is the one to be the torch-bearer, either.Xi, Putin, Netanyahu and other leaders are sharp as a tack. We deserve the same.
The parties are remarkably similar.
One of the key tenets of fascism is the forcible suppression of opposition. Right now the DNC that you’re supporting is litigating to keep Kennedy and Cornell west off of the ballot in my state. The board of electors here is all dem. They’ve agreed to not certify the signatures for Kennedy and west. They have certified the ability for the right leaning independent candidates though. Odd. Also, they’ve denied Kennedy secret service protection even though he has double digit support, credible threats to his safety etc. Furthermore they agreed to debate outside of the purview of the debate commission, colluding with CNN to set criteria for exclusion tailored to keep indoor dent candidates off of the stage. Furthermore, they ostracized any candidate that dared to primary Biden, effectively ending any opposition. Thereby stealing your right to choose your democratic candidate. Now, I suspect, they will wait until the last minute to choose their candidate (with no input from you or any other constituents). Who are the facists here? Biden may come across as a gentle grandpa but he’s a war monger. And he’s senile. A dangerous combo. I feel amazing re my support for Kennedy. At 19% nationally now. The tide will turn. And if it doesn’t, I’ll remain proud of my support for him. To vote for either Biden or Trump is to vote against your own personal liberties.It's hard to really know what the context for the "bloodbath" comment was.
it’s not hard at all. The speech is available to watch in full context. Free yourself from “clips.”I'm no lib, I'm an independent, probably socialist-dem, who feels that the most effective way to defeat the fascism element is voting dem right now
He doesn't have dementia. He has age related cognitive decline, which isn't great either. I think he's going to last in the race until the first set of high quality, post-debate opinion polls come out. I think this actually might be a best case scenario for America. The behind-the-scenes fight right now should be Witmer v. Josh Shapiro, with no other serious contenders. Both upper midwest pragmatist governors who are very popular in relatively evenly dem-gop split states. Either would be formidable, assuming it's not too late to mount a serious campaign. I think Trump is more like America's Maduro--stupid and incompetent but with an authoritarian's disposition. But I don't like gambling America's future on a guy who probably isn't fit to be president now, let alone 4 years from now, when the vanquishment of America's Maduro is there for the taking with the right candidate.
Newsom wants it too, I think, and any discussion that cuts out Kamala, well, I can think of at least one person who's gonna take issue with that. And potentially many other Black Americans. It is too late to mount a serious campaign, though. Swapping out Joe for another candidate undermines the legitimacy of future primaries, and it's already been reported that the Heritage Foundation (project 2025 authors) is looking into using a late election cycle candidate swap to bolster any potential election suits should Trump lose. And I've yet to see a convincing poll-tested analysis that shows another candidate being able to take on Trump. Yes, the "generic dem" polls better, but as soon as you slap a name on it, the favorability drops by something like 20%, is my current understanding. edit: here is polling from yesterday It isn't some sort of pro-Biden hysteria driving my concerns here, I want to assure everyone. I'm not terribly fond of him. The only thing that matters is beating Donald Trump, and I think Biden's still the best shot we have. It's unfortunate. For posterity: 1930s Germany also didn't take Hitler at his word, either, btw. They thought it was rhetorical bombast, that he was an un-serious, comical figure.
Let's do a vote swap, I vote independent in my state and you vote dem in yours, cool?
But I don’t want Biden to be president. If I did, I would just vote for him. I feel like I’m setting a very low bar but I don’t think he’ll survive 4 years, and he’s in serious cognitive decline. I don’t think he’s currently fit for office. He has the nuclear codes. The Ukraine situation is going to probably come to a head in the next few years. He can’t even admit his own decline, and his admin is unable to act rationally. Both candidates are extremely unfit. I’m not voting for either. I don’t want to be beholden to one brand of insanity over another. This has gone too far. No thanks. I’ll be quietly prepping. Happy to consider a replacement though!
Buden's cognizance is indeed a serious concern, but dawg. Dawg. There is a solid order of magnitude in the disparity of my Biden vs. Trump assessment. I'm worried we will be wishing for presidential dementia in under a year. I gotta get outta here, this place is like ground zero for detainment centers. Only San Diego might rival south Texas.
Yes that's absolutely correct. Our 25th amendment also allows for removal if a large number of persons very near to an active POTUS make the call. Welll, for now.
So is this a winning move? Vote Biden, elect the prick, hope the VP can score at least a 10 on Glasgow Coma Scale? 'Cause this sounds better than the alternative and less wasteful than independent in your climate. I'm sure mk will 'rebuke' this with some meaningless faux-profound tautology, at least he does that whenever talking to me, but you can use this as... amunition (ba dum tsh!).
That's my plan, limping this Old Dog Named Joe across the finish line. Like dragging him by the collar (Kristi Noem is taking interest). Harris would do a fine job. Like not really, there's still the uh capitalism thing, but the only way towards serious progress is through a dem victory. Living to vote another day. Sucks, of course. Before Palestine, Joe was the most unmistakably progressive president since FDR. And now it sucks to vote for him. A little. Quite a bit, really. Oh and my vote doesn't matter because of where I live. Trying to sneak out of here before the electric grid collapses, an especially noteworthy imminent collapse among a very promising field of other imminent collapses. I feel bad because I know how good Poland might look if, say, a POTUS gave you half of Ukraine and constantly makes it clear that he doesn't give a shit about America, much less Europe. But yeah man, we're cooked. We are kooky cooked cookadiddle-do, the ash is turning gray. It's ok, I'm making really good art shots fired
Nah, throwing your vote into the pile matters wherever you are. We recently had a Sołtys (like county-level official for rural areas) election where the difference between candidates was 6 votes (out of 250-someting voters). Sure, it's not the same league, our Sołtys is 47 and kicks ass as a public servant, but may POTUS match her importance and prestige one day. Your vote is no less important than mouthbreather's next in line. LOL, come on, that's basic even by my understanding of geopolitics. Ukraine is neither his/America's to give nor ours to take. Also, combining it with Poland would cause a civil war faster than most of you can spell 'Volhynia'.I know how good Poland might look if, say, a POTUS gave you half of Ukraine
Dude you need to tell your friends that an American tried to singularize a singular word (soltys).
Nah, I told you already: we're pretty understanding of this. Hell, we have plurals of collective nouns, like 'the police' (nominative singular: policja, plural: policje), so go and wrap your head around that. It's like Latin, but much weirder and less regular. You're fine. And good one, but what would we do with whole three lie-bear-ians?
The well-boy is key to lie-bear-yun stability. We're all about the 1/3 nuclear family and superbreeders.
Send the Solty over, if you can, thanks. I have once again ruined communication with a proverbial "you". I am talking about Trump giving Putin Ukraine. Even some of it. Putin lives and breathes mid-20th century Soviet expansionist propaganda. If he thinks the US is noncommittal enough with NATO, I think you have Moldova as a warning case, and then maybe latvia and estonia but god knows belarus is a done deal.
That poll actually shows the opposite of what the poster purports it to show. Trump’s highest average is against Biden, and though each of the other candidates is weaker in nominal terms than Biden, the “don’t know” is significantly wider. As the election approaches, those don’t knows will break dem if they’re given a decent candidate, trump’s approval ratings such as they are.
OTOH, Trump has not yet affixed the right-wing media upon a different target. It's all terribly unknowable. But I will tell you what I do know. We don't deserve this. Nobody deserves this. And I know that if Trump wins, I will need to seek a judge to rule on whether we can play guitars in The Camps or not.
Yes, I do know something about dementia and he actually looks like he’s in an early stages. Could be vascular. But even if it’s not “dementia” his cognitive decline is bad, very very bad for someone past the average life expectancy running for president. Trump isn’t an excuse for that. CNN didn’t cause everyone to see it and say omg beyond hosting the debate that the Biden campaign wanted.
Again, just as with Feinstein, the Biden campaign and entourage is unfortunately in large part now a protectionist racket. Careerists preserving their jobs. Biden shouldn't have ran again. The "no live fact-checking" stipulation was agreed to by the Biden campaign. So yeah, they're obviously idiots. Whoever prepped him also erred terribly, and tried to prioritize memorizing stats and facts way down in the weeds. That's obviously not how to best Trump in this format of exchange. The stupidest timeline.
You say that Biden could be mentally impacted by his age. Which is fair after the poor debate. But the man is known for his lack of debate prowess. Politically it look like he is the best president US had in years. He already did more good things for the US people and on the international front, than Obama (a great debater ) did. We can argue that he is not the creative mind behind all those good things (and I rather see you guys have Cortez or Bernie as president), but they happened either way.
That is a great point I also made back in 2020; although The President is the figurehead of any presidential administration, it's arguably just as or more important who he surrounds himself with, and those people aren't going to be terribly different for a Bernie or Biden or Harris presidency. Sadly, most Americans are almost completely unaware of anything Biden has accomplished. His legacy so far, in the eyes of most American citizens, boils down to one word - inflation. They are completely unaware that inflation was a global phenomenon resulting from the pandemic emergency spending, and even less aware that the U.S. has done a better job than any other western democracy in tamping down inflation. And we never, NEVER, discuss even the possibility of immigration blunting inflation domestically. Instead, republicans are trying to take credit for Biden's legislation. My frustration expressed in these threads doesn't stem from some religious reverence to Biden. I'm frustrated because it's clear we live in a domestic media environment obscenely favorable towards Trump. While there are obviously valid, grassroots concerns about Biden's mental acuity, the media is now entering its 11th day of attempting to strong-arm Biden out of the race. It's STILL the number one story of Washington Post and New York Times. Meanwhile, new court documents reconfirming Trump's involvement with Jeffrey Epstein have been released recently, and not a single major outlet has run a story about it. I didn't expect the oligarchy-controlled media's bid for fascism to be this obvious.
There is one and only one existential threat to America and it isn’t Donald Trump. It’s nuclear war. Full stop. I can’t fathom anyone being ok with a senile person being the ultimate cog in the nuclear chain of command. Horse race politics, for me, ends at war and nuclear war especially. Under no circumstances will I vote for a would-be nursing home patient to hold the nuclear codes. That has nothing to do with electability whatsoever. I’m 99% sure I’m not the only person who feels that way. He’s embarrassing himself and the country at this point. That Trump is a piece of garbage who gets darling treatment in the press is a totally separate issue and even if it were corrected overnight, not one that’s going to move the needle on Biden’s feebleness.
You have placed yourself inside of some information environment wherein Donald Nuke The Hurricanes Trump is the preferable candidate, y'know, from a nuclear weapons perspective, and no amount of long-winded argumentation from some pseudonymous internet poster is gonna change that.
No. You misunderstand my argument completely and probably willfully. I’m not arguing for Trump; I’m arguing against Biden. Not sure why I’m even replying, since I assume you’re just trolling me. The sooner Biden steps aside, the better. It’s inevitable at this point, so I can’t imagine what he’s waiting for. The fact that he can’t read the tea leaves makes my argument stronger, not weaker.
Nobody thinks you're arguing for Trump, they think you hate both but are arguing that Biden is more likely to use nukes than Trump. In my opinion this is a baffling take, and I too question what information you have that lead here.
Loooooooool. I’m talking about a gaping hole at the top of the military, for which nuclear war is the direst problem. Constitutionally, the president is the commander in chief. An absent cic is a constitutional crisis in and of itself. I think this place is letting its tds make it dumber by the minute.
I'm just trying to imagine Do you think the secret service jogwalks over to Biden and says And Biden says Like what do you think this process looks like, he freezes up and centcom looks around the console "oh well, there goes 10 metros, and he called Bill 'Greg', put it in the paper that he called Bill 'Greg'"? How involved do you think Joe Biden is with nuclear strategery? I think it's less than the guy floating a radioactive cyclone Sir it's 75 three megaton Russian yields about 8 degrees off the north pole right now, what do we do, sir Oh. Oh. I, I forgot my nuke playbook here on the campaign trail, oh no! I guess that's it then
You should avail yourself of some Cold War history. We came close to nuclear war in the 60s, as most people know, but also in the 80s. But for the calm thinking of leaders in the US and USSR, things could have differently. The fact that you prefer to be flip about the president’s primary job, CIC, is troubling to me.
Two things can be true at the same time. Biden can be cognitively impaired and Trump can be abysmal. The left still has time to put up a better candidate. My guess is that it will be Kamala and Whitmer. Kamala still has access to the money they’ve raised and Whitmer brings Michigan and strengthens them on their strongest issue: women’s reproductive rights. I was called crazy by family and friends for arguing strongly that the Dems needed to hold a robust primary. “You can’t primary a sitting President. He’s not too old…” was their reply. If Dean Phillips or RFKJ were the nominees Trump would be toast. Biden/Harris have four years of baggage and they can claim that inflation is getting better and they’re creating jobs etc, but people don’t feel that. People feel like inflation is out of control, interest rates are bonkers and that they’re underemployed. Meanwhile, they see billions of tax payer money flying out the door to support foreign wars/countries while our border remains porous, our country is addicted, depressed and diseased. The Dems used to be the anti-corporate corruption party, anti Wall Street, anti war, first amendment absolutists party. All that has gone away. The two party system is obsolete. Shades of grey. Biden has never met a war he didn’t like. I am afraid he will bring us to ww3. The question should be, Can Biden be our president in 3 years time? I think we all know he will be mush by then. For what it’s worth, I think trump is worse. But at least with Trump, crypto has a home in the United States. Biden/Warren’s anti crypto crusade is truly bonkers. Protecting nobody but traditional finance/banks. The Dems have lost their way and their leader is beyond too old. Let’s see what happens. This is the first time in my life I’m rooting for the Dems to lose. Following the Kennedy campaign and how the DNC is keeping him off of ballots, colluding with CNN to keep him out of debates, denying him secret service protection (latest polls have him at 19% nationally) has been eye opening. Fuck the DNC! They denied us a primary and have made their bed. Now they must lie in it. I think this place is letting its tds make it dumber by the minute.
it’s crazy. Being critical of Biden, or questioning his cognitive abilities does not mean you prefer, or tacitly condone Trump.
Does the recently leaked conversation between RFK jr and Trump change your view at all?
Honestly feel the same way. Really shows how much kleinbl00 was doing all the hard work of finding interesting things to talk about. I hope things pick back up after the election but I'm ducking out again
Who was this? Hard to know. But no matter, all the best to you. This place is only as interesting as the people here. If/when you come back, bring some interesting pals. The infrastructure is here. It has the potential to be a cool place. Wishing you well!! Godspeed!
We are, but I'd prefer to keep it a classical climate cookout, if you will. A backyards bar-b-que, as opposed to swapping the charcoal pellets for unstable Uranium isotopes.
I am starting to think that "the liberal media" has been compromised. The Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority continued to shift the law to the right in 2024 but did not go as far as it could have. Sometimes, it punted. I'm sorry, ..that is not the appropriate framing. Fuck you. I want to be very clear about something, especially for our foreign friends. I was told at an early age that no one is above the law in this country. I was told that we were all equals. Even the president. I was told that the Constitution establishes this. Now, I'm sitting here watching the establishment "liberal" media obsessively attempt to oust the democrat incumbent while suspiciously downplaying what is unequivocally an inversion of our Constitution in the era of an aspiring fascist politically aligned with the ruling SCOTUS majority. I think there was like one? two? op-ed(s) after Trump's felony convictions that was like "hey maybe Trump's not the best candidate for America". I saw a picture where the Monday SCOTUS decision was announced on A4 of Tuesday morning's WaPo print edition. Cancelled my membership a couple weeks ago. Good riddance. "Ohh, hurrdurr, do you want to prosecute Obama for killing two citizens in Yemen, you dimbodumbo???". Yeah!! Yeah, I would love that. Try for a conviction, I welcome any investigation, and I'm not opposed to e.g. declassifying intel in discovery if you can subpoena it. Ah, but you can't anymore, and that sucks. "Legal Eagle" is known for his level-headed law analysis, and this is a great video, but the thumbnail is all you need: That is the correct take. Our media has been captured by the billionaire class. I'm not really sure how much more mask-off pro-fascist they can go before the election, but I'm sure we'll find out.Key takeaways from the Supreme Court term that upended Trump’s trial
Totally with ya, as always. The day of trump immunity decision, the NYTimes had five articles rehashing Biden's debate performance, and one of "what's the supreme court up to?" where they decided that actually if you look at the numbers they've decided against trump's executive orders more often than any other president so they're not biased at all, and also look at how polarized the liberal justices are too they're just as bad. It was disgraceful. Luckily I dont think anyone outside the chin stroking class cares about the media anymore its all tik tok or whatever
This was one of my favorites regarding math'ing SCOTUS voting patterns. Everyone was wrong when it came to executive immunity, the most consequential case of this session (and surely one of the most consequential rulings ever). And the second most consequential case of the session, also 6-3, suggests that the politico piece quantified or interpreted "institutionalism" incorrectly, or that "institutionalism" takes a back seat to "conservativism" (whatever the fuck that means anymore, too) for the most important decisions. At this point, it'd be foolish to not conclude that the best model for thinking about SCOTUS is that it is currently the most activist extension of Trump's MAGA movement. It's making Project 2025 Project 2024. I should also say that folks like mk are not wrong, Biden's debate performance was a very troubling moment to behold. I tuned in to the debate after the first 30 minutes, and the remaining hour wasn't so bad. But obviously, the opening half hour is by far most crucial, and Biden botched it. Big time. Nor has Biden's response, or lack thereof, so far, been at all reassuring. But he's not like... permanently impaired or something. He had a bad opening stint of the debate. Happens. And now his polling numbers are like -4 since then. He deserves most of it. But color me skeptical that it's genuine concerns about Trump eking out a victory driving these breathless, nonstop critiques of Biden. It's obviously quite easy to absolve oneself of responsibility (note: Frum is being tongue-in-cheek here) hiding behind journalistic both-sidesism. The knives are fuckin' out, and we do actually disagree; It looks to me like the chin-stroking class runs DC. I think kowtowing to these pundits is a bad idea, not just because it would empower them further, but the amount of uncertainty it throws into the dem ticket will surely be further exploitable. And, again, Heritage Foundation is already looking into legal avenues to dispute any Biden replacement. Intentions aside, the "liberal" media is doing Trump's work for him. Bro I've listened to Trump nonsensically ramble into a battery vs. shark sinking boat dilemma story several times as proof that he is a genius, and: And that was before the debate. edit: This whole interview is lucid enough for me. Not perfect, but c'mon. edit2: Yikes. That is embarrassing, Olivia. edit3: membership's been cancelled for almost a year, now. At least some truth is still getting through
Here's NYT's opinion section right now: The first one is about how Biden is too old The second is about low legitimate! the supreme court really is The third is more about Biden's age The fourth is an honest to god pitch that Trump would be a better president because he is 1. not as old as biden and 2. more "doveish" towards Russia The screenshot is cut off here but everything else is about UK politics (fair) and seemed generally anti labor, calling the victory "hollow". Idk how to feel about that, I know nothing about england. Also, went again to double check and theres now a 4th! Biden is too old article. I think your first idea was correct. They are not both-sides-ing (which would suck too). They are actively trying to get Trump elected, for reasons I truly do not understand.
I've never seen such overwhelming disgust towards establishment media like what I'm witnessing now. Libs and leftists alike are getting maaaaaad (good thread): How am I supposed to believe that this all isn't a wee bit sus?. Nate Silver gives the game away. Thanks, Nate! If Biden steps down, the "liberal" press will immediately launch into a campaign to discredit the new dem nominee with their empowerment using everything in their toolkit. This is beyond disgusting. I will not forget this.
I would just edit this in, but editing anything after posting an embedded tweet is a messy affair, especially if other links are included. I've come to appreciate it as a disincentive structure, of sorts, but otherwise I'd spare hubski another comment. Doing this because I think I'd have liked to have had a "But Her Emails" and "Hillary's health questions" chronicling, which is essentially happening all over again. Completely agree with every element of Beau's take about tonight's ABC interview of Biden, it's worth the 8 minutes: And you know? It's sad that Biden talking about his administration's accomplishments is going to be the first time so many ABC viewers or Biden campaign season watchers hear about them. It's sad that a broken, self-destructing government drives media revenue so much higher than a functioning administration. Just some cool profit-seeking. No responsibility. Meanwhile, the interview should've been declared successful the moment Laura Loomer tweeted the lie that Biden had a medical emergency aboard Air Force One on the way home, which was of course picked up by Fox News contributors and at least one scumbag senator. Because we really needed one more example of the asymmetrical media environment.
I'll add- even without the medias spin, Biden giving a competent interview is about the least exciting story ever. So just from like a , what's fun to talk about point of view , its starting from a bad place.
It is post-debate day #15. I think it's officially Joever. The "pivotal press conference" headline is a fine example. It would be against the current rules of American pol pundits to say "he talked ok", even though he did, and even considering the use of teleprompter. The pundit class has found a way, simultaneously, to split the dems nearly down the middle on the presidential nominee while also keeping the substance of Biden's speeches almost entirely sidelined. Flip-side of the same-thing: Trump confidently lied throughout the entire debate and has been well-rewarded for it. Yeah, Biden got Gaza-Israel suuuuuper wrong, but the NATO tack is.. more than mostly OK. Which is a pretty goddamn glowing endorsement from me, when scaled to statements I typically make on geopolitics. I don't want to abandon our European (and other!) allies. They don't deserve it. But yeah, the NATO speech doesn't matter. It just doesn't. That's how this works. The NYTimes did publish a 5,000-word essay on why Trump shouldn't run a couple days ago, but the damage is done. No I'm sure the media would treat Kamala fairly and make any arguments against her in good faith (>release X to stop lying) edit: Oh yeah, btw, spence, we got another "experts say" in the screencap headlines, it's been less than two or three weeks since the last one. God, that and "critics claim" is practically essing fascist dee, at this point edit2: meanwhile >miffed shrug emoji edit3: too good not to chronicle today's WaPo spread:
