The Oregon state senate, majority Democrat, needs a quorum to pass a cap-and-trade bill addressing climate change. Rather than cede the issue, state Republicans have elected not to show up for the vote, denying Democrats their quorum. Because to show up and allow a majority to pass a bill would be just a little too close to governance. Or, as Senate Republican leader Herman Baertschiger, Jr. puts it:
- “Protesting cap-and-trade by walking out today represents our constituency and exactly how we should be doing our job,” Senate Republican Leader Herman Baertschiger Jr., of Grants Pass, said in a written statement Thursday morning. “We have endured threats of arrest, fines, and pulling community project funds from the governor, Senate president and majority leader. We will not stand by and be bullied by the majority party any longer."
Pesky when you're bullied by the majority party into allowing a bill to pass because you're not the majority; I feel you, dog, I feel you.
From gutless coward-in-hiding Sen. Tim Knopp in this morning's interview with NPR: "...in order to do business, you need to be working in a bipartisan way with your colleagues." Never mind that cap and trade was originally championed by the Right as a market-based approach to climate change. Never mind that just two years ago, top Republicans were promoting the carbon tax as an appetizing alternative to top-down environmental regulation. Presumably, what Republicans mean by bipartisan at this point is "our way or the highway."
I don't know why this specific story gets me as worked up as it does. I haven't lived in Oregon for over a decade. As a current Kentucky resident, I would cream jeans at the prospect of a Democratic majority having to put up with minority Republican hijinx. I think ultimately, it comes down to: Republicans on local, state and national levels have relied on incrementalism to slowly boil the frog of democracy. Obstructionism, demagoguery, cronyism, kleptocratics; "let the people decide," as my state senator says, until the people decide against Republican principle, and then hide out until it blows over with no change to status quo. We've gotten too used to this. These rats are chewing away at our nation's moral fabric, increasingly at the very literal fabric of our infrastructure. And everybody's looking at the individual holes saying "huh, seems like that hole shouldn't be there," but ignoring the fact that the negative space is fast overtaking.
In all fairness, the Democrats did it first. It proved ultimately ineffective. Oh well. At least we got to see The Hammer on Dancing with the Stars.
Well, goddammit. It's despicable no matter who does it. What a shitty precedent.
I was all about the Gang of 11 bailing on Austin. Redistricting Texas has proven to be a sociological disaster for Texans. And you know what? Hooray for those brave Republicans threatening armed response against those who wish to... institute carbon credits? It, too will prove ultimately ineffective but holy shit if that's what you want to go to the mattresses for I guess that's between you and posterity. I just wish posterity had a say in this shit, you know?
Pretty much. Why else is one of your state's federal senators blocking any and all attempts at reforming the elections process?