I've been rereading a lot of old American antiauthoritarians lately, for obvious reasons. wasoxygen may enjoy this one; Voltairine was closer to his camp than mine, though I doubt many there would claim her today.
This was a pretty cool read. She must have been hella fun to argue with. Roughly contemporary with People of the Abyss, though I think Jack London made the point better, with his meticulous insistence on recording the wages, incomes and expenditures of every poor person or family he came across. This Goldman thing is the sort of lovely rhetoric which I can imagine leading to a rampage through the nearby Jewish neighborhood, where the lower middle class grocers and so on are trying to build families and can only mutter "oy vey!" when bread is torn and windows broken. Meanwhile the woman wearing the ten-thousand dollar fur coat, who never descends from Gatsby-ville, goes untouched by dint of societal layering. Such is history, maybe.I once read that one million angels could dance at the same time on the point of a needle; possibly one million angels might be able to get a decent night's lodging by virtue of their constitutional rights; one single tramp couldn't.
Fascinating paragraph.My second reason for not repeating EMMA GOLDMANN'S words is, that I, as an anarchist, have no right to advise another to do anything involving a risk to himself; nor would I give a fillip for an action done by the advice of some one else, unless it is accompanied by a well-argued, well-settled conviction on the part of the person acting, that it really is the best thing to do. Anarchism, to me, means not only the denial of authority, not only a new economy, but a revision of the principles of morality. It means the development of the individual as well as the assertion of the individual. IT means self-responsibility, and not leader worship. I say it is your business to decide whether you will starve and freeze in sight of food and clothing, outside of jail, or commit some overt act against the institution of property and take your place beside TIMMERMANN and GOLDMANN. And in saying this I mean to cast no reflection whatever upon Miss Goldmann for doing otherwise. She and I hold many differing views on both Economy and Morals; and that she is honest in hers she has proven better than I have proven mine. Miss Goldmann is a communist; I am an individualist. She wishes to destroy the right of property, I wish to assert it. I make my war upon privilege and authority, whereby the right of property, the true right in that which is proper to the individual, is annihilated. She believes that co-operation would entirely supplant competition; I hold that competition in one form or another will always exist, and that it is highly desirable it should. But whether she or I be right, or both of us be wrong, of one thing I am sure; the spirit which animates EMMA GOLDMAN is the only one which will emancipate the slave from his slavery, the tyrant from his tyranny--the spirit which is willing to dare and suffer.
Thanks, I was just asking flagamuffin for some distaff reading suggestions. That "seditious person" quoted sure was a badass. Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?