·
- At this time, the Reddit community can still choose to use Imgur or other sites for image hosting.
At this time.
should have said:Users frequently cross-link between the sites, using Imgur links to effectively share image posts and comments on Reddit, and Reddit links to point people to deeper discussions of content.
Users frequently cross-link between the sites, using Imgur links to effectively share image posts and comments on Reddit, and Hubski links to point people to deeper discussions of content.
–
I don't know much about Reddit. From the little I've read about it, I'm curious about what prompted this policy change. As the article notes, 2015 was a difficult year for Reddit in terms of creating content policies. With images added, that makes more policing issues as the article notes here. What's the advantage to hosting its own images?With the addition of images, Reddit will have to do a lot more work to enforce its content policy. Before, it could always claim that offensive images like nude photos of celebrity Jennifer Lawrence that were distributed through its site were hosted elsewhere. Now, if it doesn’t police the uploads, more of the disgust and anger could fall on Reddit.
–
francopoli · 1150 days ago · link ·
Ads.What's the advantage to hosting its own images?
–
–
francopoli · 1150 days ago · link ·
They collect more and more data on what you look at, what you upvote and what you interact with. That data makes you more valuable for targeted advertising. So instead of hammering thousands of page-views worth of ads at the whole site, they can target ads at the people most likely to click on the link. So, for example, people in the twoxchomosone subreddit will be assumed female and shown ads related to women. If that same user then goes to a makeup sub, they get cosmetics ads. If that person then hangs out in the overwatch sub and starts to interact, then they know that this person is also a gamer and can be shown computer parts. Go into a 'local' sub and now a local business can say "Show my ad to women who are in my city and play games" and pay a bit more for the ads that are shown. If that same user goes to a sub that focuses on food, then they will get restaurants or maybe amazon ads for cookware. the more data they have on this user, the more detailed the ad buy can be and the more reddit can charge for the targeted exposure. This move also works toward a more complete audience capture. Keep your audience on your site as much as possible. If they are going to Imgur to post pictures to link to reddit, that time on Imgur is not spent looking at ads and interacting with reddit's ad network. The ads might be the same based on the link in the threads, but with more information on the user base, the better they get at targeting.
–
Thank you for the explanation. That makes sense. The more facetime with the site allows for more exposure to ads. I didn't think of it like that before. If people go to imgur, they might spend more time there instead.This move also works toward a more complete audience capture. Keep your audience on your site as much as possible. If they are going to Imgur to post pictures to link to reddit, that time on Imgur is not spent looking at ads and interacting with reddit's ad network.
user-inactivated · 1151 days ago · link ·
Hmm. Imgur is much clunker now than when I first learned about it. Hopefully it doesn't get much worse. I can only imagine how awkward it would feel to use Reddit as an imaging hosting site for what I post on Hubski. Imgur feels like a neutral party in comparison.
–
Let's be honest: Imgur exists because a Redditor decided Imageshack shouldn't make money. They then discovered that, without Conde Nast to pay their bills, they had to become Imageshack. There's no fucking money in image hosting. It's a loss leader. This is why both Google and Yahoo (Flickr) make it so hard to hot-link their shit. This is why Imageshack has always made it impossible. Reddit is pulling away from Imgur because Imgur is focusing heavily on their community, not their images - I've got shit that's been up there for eight years or whatever and suddenly it's got comments on it. A plague on both their houses.
–
francopoli · 1151 days ago · link ·
And Imgur sucks for anything high def, 4K or that you want uncompressed, like, say, astrophotos. I'm going to kick in and pay for astrobin once I get the court shit settled and have a solid budget for the rest of the year. The benefit of building a community like Imgur is doing is that it creates a captive audience you can build data on, to sell to advertisers. "If the service is free, you are the product." Bandwidth is cheap. Server farms are expensive and need constant diligence. And an image site needs one heck of a server farm if it want to be big.
–
Talk to me about why not Flickr. They're an integral part of my backup strategy and I find that they not only compress their online stuff very, very little but they'll actually take camera raw and archive it for you if you want. There are two aspects of Yahoo that don't suck: Yahoo Finance and Flickr. And Flickr sucked for a lonnnnng time.
–
francopoli · 1150 days ago · link ·
Wow, looking at it for the first time, in like forever, it looks like Yahoo actually invested in Flickr. I got pissed and noped out when they let it stagnate for about 3-4 years.
–
My theory is that Marissa Mayer took one look at Flickr, decided it would never suit her social strategy, and proceeded to buy and fuck up Tumblr. Meanwhile, the veteran galley slaves left belowdecks at Flickr said "quick! Roll out functionality and featuresets before the coxswain returns!" and created a substantially useful photography site.