He had claimed that Harris is historically illiterate, ignorant, morally callous, an undisciplined pseudo-intellectualNot seeing the issue here.
Not seeing the issue here.
Can you admit that's a separate allegation from the 'get-rich-quick-scheme' thing? And that if you're going to critique Harris, you have to take him at his word about his beliefs?
Probably. What happens after I admit those two things?
Then, theoretically, we could have a reasoned discussion about the appropriate response to radical, militant Islam / Islamism.