a thoughtful web.
Share good ideas and conversation.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by b_b
b_b  ·  1939 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Is the Many Worlds hypothesis just a fantasy?

Actually, calling it a hypothesis is just a way to make it sound like science. It is not a hypothesis. It is a guess. A hypothesis is, by definition, testable.





am_Unition  ·  1938 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I think it's assumed that we'll someday devise a test or develop the tech to perform such a test. Not sure if that'll pan out.

There may just be some fundamental facets of reality that we'll never understand, almost like we were meant to face existential crises, regardless of where we find ourselves living in the evolutionary timeline. Definitively answering one question begs several more.

bioemerl  ·  1939 days ago  ·  link  ·  

The many worlds hypothesis is to explain some quirk in mathematics, isn't it? Wouldn't fixing that quirk without needing such a theory, or finding math that proves the idea a form of test?

4TRANdan  ·  1938 days ago  ·  link  ·  

It's an interpretation of the observation that, at the quantum scale (really really small), nature appears to be intrinsically uncertain. Even if we knew as much as possible about a system (there's actually a limit), we would only be able to say how probable each possible outcome is. We cannot predict one certain outcome.

This is in stark contrast to objects at the scale of our everyday lives. Sure, some things are just too complicated to keep track of (like grains of sand in a sandstorm). Let's instead isolate things to, say, two billiard balls. If we precisely measured the positions of the balls, their velocities, the friction of the table, etc, we could very accurately predict the outcome. If we reset the balls, and repeated the experiment, we would get almost the same results.

If we then replaced the billiard balls with atoms, things would be very different. Even reproducing the starting conditions exactly, your outcome would not be the same every time. This oddity has given rise to many contradicting interpretations, none of which can really be taken as fact.

Probably the most commonly accepted interpretations is the Copenhagen interpretation, which says that things really are random, the Universe just works that way. The most comforting interpretation is what I think you are referring to, called the hidden variable interpretation, which basically says the Universe isn't random ("God does not play dice"), and we're just missing something. Another interpretation, which is perhaps both exciting and terrifying, is the many worlds hypothesis. It says that things aren't random: every single possibility happens all at once, just in separate Universes.

The wise thing for now is to take all of these with a grain of salt.