Pondering yet another re-write of my undergrad thesis as I work on it. This thing has changed so much since it's inception I'm starting to doubt if my original sources even make sense for the point I'm trying to argue. I have a lot written, but having words on paper is not a guarantee that they mean anything relevant or intelligible. My adviser thinks I have good insight though so I'm trusting her assessment. I'm also mucking around with the idea of including a set of survey questions that could provide a physician outcome affecting insight in specific challenging situations. (Intentionally vague, I have a better idea but want to polish it) However that started about 2 hours ago. I spent the morning playing GTAV trying to perfect my airport ramp flips.
You should get someone who is not you to check the sources. Sometimes, because we have lots of extra knowledge, we can "get" why a source is cited, but to someone not inside the situation, it makes no sense. like some of those words that get used in crossword puzzles. The ones where the question is really obscure, but they've been using it forever so everyone who does crosswords regularly knows the answer right away?