Vladimir Putin: As for some ultra conservatives coming to power and tightening the screws – let them screw away. They can screw and screw until they screw up. They are pursuing a policy that is costly and ineffective. Okay, they have changed regimes in North Africa, but what will they do there now? Ultimately Israel will find itself caught between two fires… It is hard to say what kind of regime Egypt will end up with, and it’s hard to say what sort of a mess they’ll make in Syria. No one can predict what will happen in the Maghreb countries either. Are you sure they are in control of the situation there? Apparently, they are trying to control it, but nobody, including them, knows what will come of it. That’s why whatever is being done… There is pressure for change, but it’s very costly with little efficiency so far. ... Leonid Ivashov: Mr Rogov spoke about negotiations with the United States and whether Obama’s presidency is good or bad for Russia. We can see even during the recent decades that America has a clear-cut geopolitical agenda, a political strategy and specific programmes no matter who sits in the White House. Take, for instance, the air defence programme. It was initiated under Bill Clinton and then taken up by George Bush and now Obama. Same goes for Yugoslavia: its destruction was spearheaded by a Democrat, and then G.W. Bush continued with Iraq and Afghanistan. Now, we have seen how a Nobel Prize winner destroyed Libya. So, we shouldn’t have any illusions about this. Of course, we need to pursue talks, at least to keep our Foreign Ministry busy. Interesting read.Sergei Rogov (Director, Institute for US and Canadian Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences): When Reagan came up with “star wars,” some people in our country decided that we were doomed, but later an asymmetrical response was found and strategic stability was maintained. And now, in my opinion, there is a real opportunity to avoid past mistakes, to answer with a similar response. In this regard, looking at the United States, we see that the US is on the prowl. We cannot rule out a Republican presidential victory. Maybe it’s only a 20-30 percent chance, but they could win. Actually, Dmitry Rogozin’s “friend” Senator Kyl, from Arizona is retiring, but if a Republican administration is reelected, they will be “neocons” who would make the Bush administration look like kids.
Anyway, my read of this was turned fairly upside down after reading the latest 2 articles by Putin. In http://premier.gov.ru/eng/events/news/18252/ he basically lets out the "sensitive subject" (for Russians) that some of those 23 Trillion will be heading to foreign arms manufacturers. He also underlines that Russian Federation is "fully integrated" into the world economy and WTO, makes kissy kissy noises for IMF, et al. And if it wasn't clear in the dialogue, the articles make it clear Putin wants to create a military-industrial complex. Anyway, my question is: Is that really Vladimir Putin (these past couple of years) or a double? The new one looks pretty strange .. http://www.trinity.edu/jdunn/images/YoungWorldLeaders/putin5...
He was getting bags around the eyes: http://www.sevenreflections.com/images/people/Vladimir_Putin... But then got some work done: http://i.usatoday.net/news/_photos/2012/02/27/Russia-Ukraine... http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/putin-post.jp...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/8788... I wouldn't put using a double past him, but this really looks to me like bad surgery. He's wily, but also vain.