a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by humanodon

Right, this article is calling out the NYT for being alarmist and not knowing their shit.





istara  ·  3656 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Yeah - the original article doesn't use that term. I think the linked article is confusing "fad" with something like "phenomenon" or "occurrence" or "trend" even.

insomniasexx  ·  3656 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Right, but the NYT article doesn't call it a fad. I simply disagree with the use of that word in this case. This article isn't satire or parody - it is a takedown of a shitty NYT article. Which is fine, but don't use the word fad, especially when NYT never called it a fad.

thenewgreen  ·  3656 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Hence the. #nottheonion tag.

Some very loose and irresponsible "journalism" on the part of the NYT's. What's worse is now detractors can quote this steaming like of poo with their brand giving such fear mongering credence. I heard it quoted this morning on a radio program espousing that it's "more dangerous than previously thought."

humanodon  ·  3656 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Aw man, that's the problem with a paper like the NYT. Even when they print garbage it gets quoted. Well, I guess this article just speaks to the state of reportage in the US, unfortunately. I know theadvancedapes has talked about decoupling politics from money and I think that idea certainly has its merits, but I also think that decoupling journalism from its dependency on money and outside/private interests is also something that needs to happen.

kleinbl00  ·  3656 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Fortunately the worst that can happen is going to war on false pretenses.