Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking. Login or Take a Tour!
:)
But seriously, no. I would freak if Google searches started returning Hubski threads. Search for Hubski threads on Hubski is good. Finding them on a Google search would be like finding phone conversations in the library shelves. I guess that's kind of what finding Google+ conversations feels like.
Yeah, being facetious.
But in all seriousness, this gets to the heart of what Google is, as opposed to what Google does. What it is is the same as GM and ExxonMobile and Boeing and Bank of America. What it does is search, but this is only a conduit to serve its is, and does is therefore always subservient to is (yes, I'm sorry for the awful word play; bored at home).
–
thenewgreen · 4485 days ago · link ·
I just reread your comment but switched the words in the last sentence as such:
is=corporation does=search Then it makes complete sense.
–
http://www.bespacific.com/mt/archives/014335.html
Someone was probably having fun, but this is too rich: http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Steinheiser_Rick_1382240514.a...
–