a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by ecib

Setting aside the judge's boneheaded and simply incorrect ruling, this scenario is the logical outcome across the board of the anti-choice crowd's efforts to define a fetus as a child at every point possible leading back towards inception itself.

Women's ability to move freely across land while pregnant is literally at stake here, and rulings like these can only be more common despite a judges personal belief, if they are based upon laws with premises forged by the philosophy mentioned above.

Just a taste of what could be.