I am an atheist, and I care about the way non-religious belief is communicated by atheists to the public. Over the years, I have become increasingly disappointed with the way atheists explain our origins to the public. In the future, I hope that we stop underselling how much science knows about “how we got here.”
>If I ever had the chance to answer a question similar to the questions Dawkins and Jillette encountered, I know exactly what I would say:
Great points, but do you really think that Mr. O'Reilly would let you get more than two sentences into that little prepared speech?