Once again, Mr. Marks, I appreciate your analysis but I don't think I agree.

How can someone run "a disruption strategy" banking on "mobilizing enough of the 63.7% of eligible voters who had disengaged from politics" while also "assum(ing) that most politically engaged Republican supporters will cast their ballots for him"? You're effectively arguing that insiders will vote for Trump because he's a Republican but outsiders will vote for him because he isn't a Republican.