Here's the thing: you said that Hubski is a content aggregator. Is it a similar website? Yes. No one's arguing that. As someone who used Hubski often, I am telling you, specifically, on the Internet, no one calls Hubski a content aggregator. If you wanted to be specific like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing. If you're saying "aggregator family" you're referring to the interblag grouping of "forum", which includes things from Paradox Plaza to neoGAF to reddit. So your reasoning for calling Hubski a content aggregator is because random people "call the forums aggregators"? Let's get image boards and BBS's in there, then, too. Also, calling Hubski an aggregator or a website? It's not one or the other, that's not how the Internet works. They're both. An aggregator is an aggregator and a website. But that's not what you said.You said an aggregator is a website, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the website family aggregators, which means you'd call image boards, BBS's, social networks, and other websites aggregators as well. Which you said you don't. It's okay just to admit that you're wrong, you know?