Share good ideas and conversation.   Login, Join Us, or Take a Tour!
ooli's comments


Free terminal given to every citizen to access an online service. It was heavily monetized, mostly with porn and chat room (social network)

To this day I dont get how the French didnt have a leg up on how to monetize the internet when everyone was wondering how to make money out of the internet in 2000

ooli  ·  104 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Give me an adventure!

Lute of invisibility sound so fun to play. Must make for great session

ooli  ·  107 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Body Positivity Is a Scam

It's not about changing advertising business model.

It's more about feeling better.. and telling our own truth (it's hard to be fat, black, mutilated, trans..) should not be censured because "body positivity attitude"

    Nothing has changed in how most people feel about themselves; instead, it’s simply become very gauche to articulate any of those negative feelings. That wouldn’t be very body-positive of you.

But I'm biased against any "positive" thinking since that :

Even more biased against Negative thinking. But the opposite of Negative self-talk, it's not positive: it's objective/realistic thinking.

moslydeaf  ·  106 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Word, I can support that. Thanks for the response.

ooli  ·  378 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: The mysterious Voynich manuscript has finally been decoded - clickbait

This remind me how Reddit cracked a "code" in 2 day for the FBI a few years back.

The FBI (or CIA) asked people for help about a 5 sentences code in a murder affair. Someone on reddit (who was under medication) proved it was not a code but just short hand for anti-psychotic drug prescription , the user probably kept on him as a reminder.

That was pretty neat.. i like the energy to find that thread again, but it was really good.

EDIT: Or may be reddit didnt because the FBI still asking for help :

(sorry commenting on my own post)

ooli  ·  470 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: This is How Google will Collapse Reporting from the very near, post-Google future

What I like so much about google is how inherently bad they are. They failed at anything that is not ads, or data/user-work extraction.

They have the most money in the world, the best mind in the best working environment, the most trapped customer/users/workforce, the most data, they choose the headlines... and .. all their grand plan are utmost failure.

  Everyone was talking about their glass. That was the future. They spend a shit-ton of money. The fad lasted 6 month.. more surprisingly Apple followed the proven failure trend with their watch.. Blind leading the blinds

  Google+ .. it was launched with such a bravado, forcing anyone who made a google-search once in their life to have an account, or something. Outing trans, ruining life in the process.. The "new facebook" is a failure.

  Last year that was the self-driving car. It made the headline (because google own the headlines) every time the car made a turn. It seems it's a dead end. I heard they sold their software and the self-driving business for a penny. Because it's shit, I guess.

  Now the AI. Every time they beat a Go-player, or something, we heard how great their AI is. It's probably another turd, because the headlines are already on the decline.

They are so bad at making anything else than selling ad.. It's funny.

That's my only solace: I can laugh at my overlord. While they still pouring money in a new dung-pile, and selling my data, and making me do the work to better their software/search-engine

Isherwood  ·  470 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I dunno. Android seems really good. My Google Assistant works much better than Alexa. Chrome is a good product. My office uses Google Suite, as do most offices I work with. I think they've had a lot of successes, but they're mixed in with a lot of failures.

ooli  ·  627 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: 3 Questions with @kleinbl00

"In the end, Sisyphe come to appreciate pushing its rock" -Camus (paraphrased)

It's still not very fulfilling to go hard at pushing a rock, but hey, as long as we find joy in it ... I guess

But I'm the hubski token french commentator, so I have a duty to go hard at reminding how lazy and strikes-lover we are

thenewgreen  ·  627 days ago  ·  link  ·  

"Life is suffering." -Buddha

francopoli  ·  627 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Life is a bowl of bagel-dogs, but there are unpleasanties. Les Claypool

another pessimist!

I trust them whatever the cost could be.

ooli  ·  821 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Wow, Mark Zuckerberg Is Paranoid As Fuck

When you post on facebook you assume they only get what you wanted to show (let say, a photo of you in a nice tank top)

The problem being that facebook also get the time of posting, the location, the people watching the photo, your age, gender, OS, browser, browsing history prior to the posting, etc...

So we all believe we just let go a little innocent picture in the wild, while we've been milked for far more data ...

and then those data are sold and used for profit by that rich dumb dude with duck tape on his computer.

I lack any expertise to judge how accurate, trustworthy the study is.

What I really like about it, is that it give an explanation on why human reached intelligence and not chimps.

And the explanation is super neat: sex equality. True or false it is still a pretty good narrative.

kantos  ·  836 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Due to time and proximity from my work on past studies, I can't post for reference the studies done as of yet. Unfortunately, my impromptu search on the web for the theory isn't proving helpful at the moment... That said, as with many things in human history, there are many facets to historic changes. The sex equality is a compelling argument, and not what I'd subscribe to as the major facet.

From what I studied, with the rise of agriculture and sedentary populations, humanity also experienced many more strifes as consequence. Conflict over land, chronic disease, nutrient deficiencies - the last couple of which can be easily expounded upon here. In fact, once I get back home I hope to post a bit more on that, too. The whole subject is very interesting on what agriculture did to our bodies themselves, but I digress.

The main focus here that was touched upon in lecture was the emergence of war and competition for land and resources during the Neolithic era (around the time of agriculture showing up). As you can read at the wiki site in the previous paragraph, you can see that agriculture was shitty with regard to nutrition. Furthermore, agriculturists can work for longer hours with not only less results, but sometimes for naught.

    The study, published in the journal Science, set out to investigate the apparent paradox that while people in hunter-gatherer societies show strong preferences for living with family members, in practice the groups they live in tend to comprise few closely related individuals.

Those tied to the now profession of farming allows others free time to fill alternative roles in their society as populations grow; whereas populations grow, families become larger and allow for offspring to contribute to farming.

    The social organization of mobile hunter-gatherers has several derived features, including low within-camp relatedness and fluid meta-groups.

I would interpret that this implies agriculturists are not (which, of course, being my interpretation seems to further the theory taught) . Hence, a social stratification ensues - I believe it fits well with the theory that sex equality shifts at this point. All of this serves the base for war as a tool to usurp others' resources (food, land, workers) for another's gain and survival. Enter: the natural law, to some level, the amassing of power to some form of leadership to in a form of security contract in order to ensure the well-being of both the lands and farmers working the land ... not to mention the villagers/peoples themselves. Populations rise, social stratifications increase (due to wealth, less social mobility due to specialized roles), and soon fiefdom doesn't look to shabby.

It irks me to no end that I can't find the evidence that I'm searching for on the web right now. I'll reply to this comment once I get back home with the sources. I hope some of this is good food for thought, and I'd love to read of other theories or ideas!

ooli  ·  836 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I dont doubt the switch from Hunter to farmer was traumatic. It gave birth to the Abel (hunter) and Cain (farmer) story. And it is not a nice portrayal of farmers.

The chimps told us, that male dominance dont need farming to occur.

The article pretend we are intelligent because we were a sex-equal species (less inbreeding)

The probelm with the study reside in the way they mesured sex-equality:

Why using the dispersion of family member? That sound like a second level indicator prone to be influenced by other factors (not only sex-equality, but wealth, heat, culture, whatever in fact)

I'd rather have the hunter gathere society being ask question about gender role, and compare that to a poll in a male dominated society, or in Danemark, and see how their responses mesure up.

But I like to believe we are intelligent because we're the only species with a natural sex-equalty.. and a white sclera

kantos  ·  835 days ago  ·  link  ·  

    The probelm with the study reside in the way they mesured sex-equality:

    Why using the dispersion of family member? That sound like a second level indicator prone to be influenced by other factors (not only sex-equality, but wealth, heat, culture, whatever in fact)

    I'd rather have the hunter gathere society being ask question about gender role, and compare that to a poll in a male dominated society, or in Danemark, and see how their responses mesure up.

Ah, I think I see your point. That's something I'd be interested in as well. I can only assume the hunter-gatherer societies left are isolated to Central/South America now-a-days, but what do I know.

Definitely a cool article. I'd like to point out that modern humans and neanderthals (along with many others in genus Homo) seemed to interbreed quite a bit when cultures met.

Anyways, I thought you may be interested in this article which is about an emerging theory that certain breed of dog willingly domesticated themselves for their own benefit. Interesting stuff, all of this. :)

ooli  ·  864 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: New study supports natural causes, not alien activity, explain mystery star's behavior

Oh! So EVERY stars shows a dip in light for the past 100 years. As our photographic equipment went better during that period, it could only mean one thing .....

We are the one being enclosed into a Dyson sphere.. slowly.. unwillingly.. by unknown entities!

kleinbl00  ·  863 days ago  ·  link  ·  

ooli  ·  914 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Running slower to run further and maybe run faster

I now understand why I'm so sad when I read post like that. Or about meditation app, and calorie tracking.

You might substitute external motivation for your internal motivation:

Numbers, stats, tracker are great, I love them... until they replace what's important.

WanderingEng  ·  914 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I feel I have a mix of trackers and personal motivation that works for me. You're definitely right, people can and do get buried in numbers and miss the reasons that matter most.

For me it's a mix of using them to motivate myself. I want to run further or faster, and tracking my runs helps me do that. And the heart rate monitor helps me understand what my body is telling me.

I probably worded it poorly. Seeing my high heart rate wasn't a "my heart rate is wrong" moment, it was "what can I learn from this?" What I learned is that may explain why I find it hard to go further, and doing runs designed to strengthen my heart can lower it for all runs. It'a helped me get back to what I wanted: to do more.

ooli  ·  939 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Other than Hubski, what websites do you visit frequently?


reddit here are the subreddits I watch . Log out or you'll be limited to 50 subs. Lurk, never comment, nor post, they dont deserve you.

voat. A bunch of racist kids, angry at the world. You can block them (but dont, you need a taste of their fears and hatred, just never debate them) and the technological/science game from others voaters is on point.

ruzzit cause when you're not on facebook, you still need to know what's up.

detente to watch US/UK series. Because youtube sucks. Bring some good adblocker

jango Music radio by preferred artiste. Because spotify sucks.

Bypel  ·  909 days ago  ·  link  ·  

    voat. A bunch of racist kids, angry at the world. You can block them (but dont, you need a taste of their fears and hatred, just never debate them)

never debate them


ArtemusBlank  ·  909 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Probably because they won't change their minds on the Internet. I mean how many people's minds have you changed on the Internet? An average Internet argument will most likely go on and on without either party learning anything. Eventually both parties will get tired and just move on but nobody's mind will most likely be changed at least not on the site.

ooli  ·  941 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: How have you lost weight?
lil  ·  941 days ago  ·  link  · video just came out. Could be its own post.



ooli  ·  947 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: 3 Questions with @goobster

I'm glad we get to know goobster a little bit. And I hope tng will keep on questioning new members of the community. But, but, dude, dont brag too much about the mute button... It's so harsh to be muted: You come to a post, you want to participate and it says: "You cannot comment here because this user muted you". So harsh! But I must admit I like it a lot too.

goobster  ·  947 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Sorry about that. I've just seen spammers come on the site and post stupid shit. So I mute them. And poof! they're gone. Never have to listen to them again.

I don't think I've been muted. Yet. So maybe I'll feel differently about it then.

But, more likely, I'll go for some deep introspection about what I posted, rather than blaming someone else.

thenewgreen  ·  947 days ago  ·  link  ·  

It is an extremely rare occurrence, from my experience, when the mute function is used in a casual way. With almost 100% certainty, most people know exactly why they were muted and for the most part, where I've seen it employed, I've found it justified.

Why would I want to converse with someone that actively doesn't want to converse with me?

Also, we will most definitely continue these. goobster -thanks again. I really enjoyed this one and I hope you feel good about the final audio.


goobster  ·  947 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Thanks mate! I enjoyed it.

ooli  ·  973 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: The aliens are silent because they're dead

Your argument for the no-contact is :

-Alien are way beyond us (ants). But hey, we study ants at least. That's called the 'Zoo scenario' (we're the pet).

Some other arguments are:

-They stay in their Dyson sphere, happy with their lives without any need to conquer the galaxy.

-They communicate by means beyond our understanding (Snowden used that argument by saying that aliens use encryption)

- We're part of the alien: Earth was randomly seeded with life because aliens found it the fastest way to populate the galaxy.

The best one:

- Everyone stay silent, because there are some killer robots or something out there. (Ancient Aliens need a ton of episodes about that)

Other arguments are mostly about death:

-Life is ultra rare

-Life is fragile ( this article argument's)

-Sentience is doomed (to kill itself before take off)

All this is so fun