Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking. Login or Take a Tour!
- Over the last year or two I’ve noticed that conversations about the future of work are now mostly about machines—how smart ones will do fantastic things to make our lives better, or how they’ll make human labor redundant and create a jobless dystopia. My training in economics has led me to be skeptical of both sides in this debate. After all, during the Industrial Revolution extraordinary labor-saving technological change had both good (cheaper products) and bad (pollution) effects. It also resulted in a tremendous increase in hours of work. The lesson from this historical episode, and plenty of others, is that technology doesn’t determine incomes, distribution, employment, or quality of life. It’s one factor in a much larger context.
Ay-fucking-men
WanderingEng · 3085 days ago · link ·
I thought this was going to go the direction of human-replacing machines needing large amounts of energy. Today, that means coal and natural gas, and that means worsening climate change.