a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by thundara
thundara  ·  4016 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: A list of "Men's Rights" issues that feminism is already working on

    It's also weird because it seems to imply that if women were "allowed" to participate in these jobs that perhaps equal numbers of women would choose to do so.

Many decades ago, women were snuffed down by the scientific community because they were believed not to be as intelligent as men. Now the most recent fight has been to remove roadblocks for women in the army. If the question is "are there gender roadblocks in certain careers," the answer is most certainly a "yes."





AnSionnachRua  ·  4016 days ago  ·  link  ·  

It's absolutely true that there are gender roadblocks, but the point is that it is not individual people who put those roadblocks there. It's not because the manager of the mine says that a women is not allowed to work there that she is not allowed to work there; it is because that manager lives within a community in which gender values prohibit women from working in mines.

In the same sense, if I try to purchase alcohol but I'm under 18, it's not because the shopowner refuses to sell me alcohol that I can't get it - it's because of a broader system governing behaviour - the law. (I'm just using this is an example, so as to avoid seguing into a discussion about the intersectionality of gender and law and so on...)

thundara  ·  4016 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Is there de jure enforcement of no women in coal mines? I'd always assumed that it was a de facto thing...

(See my cousin comment for more chit-chat)

AnSionnachRua  ·  4015 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Huh. Well, actually, I didn't mean to imply that there was de jure enforcement - de facto works just the same.

thundara  ·  4015 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I should correct myself: Is it de facto enforcement that no women will be hired in a mine? Or a fact of life that no women apply to work in a mine?

humanodon  ·  4016 days ago  ·  link  ·  

It's undeniable that women face roadblocks, but they of course are not the only ones. The focus of the question I was responding to was specifically about dangerous industrial jobs, rather than roadblocks women face in general in terms of employment.

Since coal mining was used as the example, if women were suddenly eligible to work in coal mines in exactly the same capacity as men and if the men working in the coal mines were doing it purely out of preference, would equal numbers of women choose to become coal miners? Would as many men become coal miners if they were prior to hire at the mine, presented with "cushy secretarial work and various yarn-themed activities" as a way of making a living?

I really don't know.

thundara  ·  4016 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Well, that's the second front to the question: Should under-represented groups be encouraged to fill historically gender/racially-biased jobs?

I have a feeling that few will argue about it in the case of coal mining, but you definitely see it in the fields of science. I have yet to see any contention over those movements, though. Occasionally, hacker news has a discussion about women in computing fields, but usually they are about how to promote interest in the industry (As well as combat sexism within it), not whether to.

The lack of any discussion about a particular job, such as coal mining, probably reflects it being an unfavorable job that no one wants, but unfortunately a few find themselves doing for lack of a better option.

AnSionnachRua  ·  4015 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Yeah, people usually only talk about people getting into jobs and positions that are highly sought after, so everyone wants to see more women in science and everyone thought it was fantastic that a black man became US president but no one seems to say "hey, there should be more female garbage men."

They're making a barely distinguishable but critical mistake. The point is not that certain groups do get into certain places in society; the point is that the roadblocks preventing them from gaining access are removed. (This is sort of tied in to what humanodon said about balance.) Focusing on getting certain people into certain places is part of the illusion of the whole "glass ceiling" thing. It isn't about numbers. Attitudes toward black people, overall, are probably not going to change significantly just because Barack Obama was elected.

Although, in the long term, it probably does make a difference. And it does suggest that at least people are willing to elect a black president, but then that makes it a symptom of changing attitudes, and not a terrifically powerful causal factor. (And, of course, the fact that many would have voted for him because he was black is itself a problem.)