And how did we get this intel? By undermining the entire premise of Scaramucci's threats, of course.
- Asked about press reports that he has already begun to fire West Wing staffers, Scaramucci mentioned that name of a particular staffer floated in a news story as a likely candidate for firing, and said this was one of his frustrations with the leaks coming from the West Wing.
“This is actually a terrible thing,” he said. “The fact that you guys know about it before he does really upsets me as a human being and as a Roman Catholic, you got that? So I should have the opportunity, if I have to let someone go, to let the person go in a very humane, dignified way.”
It was a close call between posting this or the Boy Scout Jamboree speech [WARNING: video autoplays]. I usually hate listicles, but most other articles include phrases like "...angers parents", and then we arrive at embedded tweets. Nooo.
Edit: mmm sorry, update, confirming one of last week's leaks.
Edit2: In which we finally get to things that unquestionably matter, i.e. legislation: House passes Russia sanctions bill, setting up veto dilemma for Trump. Will he veto? Will he tweet his rage?