Because your definition of "win" is irrelevant. to whit: Chaffetz has calmly and professionally investigated Clinton's email server 33 times. He has sworn to continue to do so even past inauguration. Meanwhile he's sucking the cock of a president who goes on capslock twitter rants in the middle of the night and treats federal appellate judges as if they were Rosie O'Donnell. You keep asserting that calmness and poise win debates as if it were true and you have never once offered a single reason or example as to why it would possibly be. Somehow you got the idea that the purpose of this meeting was to get answers from Jason Chaffetz. It wasn't. The purpose of this meeting, to those who attended it, was to express vituperative hatred and displeasure at the previous actions of Jason Chaffetz. You think the walking sphincter is going to moderate his behavior as the result of a 90 minute Q&A? 'cuz you have no reason to think that. On the other hand, attempting to moderate his behavior through convincing him he might just get run over on the way home hasn't been tried yet. Thus, a surly crew of mormons. Nothing wrong with frothing loons... particularly when several hundred of them show up to demonstrate the likelihood of Chaffetz' re-election. Rome did not create a great empire by having meetings, they did it by killing all those who opposed them. -unknownWhy is this so hard to understand?
will always lead to the Republicans looking composed and professional, and their detractors looking like frothing loons.
He asked questions from random people in the crowd, not a select few plants. He gave them the opportunity to ask followup questions if they were not satisfied with his response. He showed up, in person, and answered questions live for an hour and a half.