Nice, easy to understand approach to visualise ones one contribution to one of the major problems of our time Edit: mistake in title
Chemist here (actually a biochemist/botanist)... anyway, you do not need that "^" in CO2, CO2 is just fine. Although what would be even better would be to have the 2 as a subscript, but I do not know how to do that in hubski yet.
My guess is that with this model the footprint estimates would be low since it seems these values are based on German figures, and Germany is very green. So, lets say I am sitting in an inefficient country that wastes resources... I have a feeling using my computer here might have a larger carbon footprint.
True Don't know how I came to the weird '^'. Wrote in quite a haste and CO2 looked so wrong
the way I understood it they make an estimate on products and then add a region specific figure on top. chances are you're already over the limit without considering region. And that's the point this model wants to bring across, so I figured it would still be appropriate.