If you actually believe that, as the stuffy (or dystopian, I'm not sure which is worse) folks at the MIT Technology Review clearly do, I've got a bridge to sell you (which doesn't exist, but that doesn't matter). Go ahead, I want to actually see you define yourselves, so everybody can see the difference and decide for themselves.

"As we've explained in the past, the advances required to create truly autonomous weapons are still a little ways off. And other experts believe that a call to halt research and development may overlook ethical arguments that would be better thrashed out: robot soldiers could, after all, mean fewer deaths on the battle fields."