As Mariani reminds us, it was, of all people, Williams—whose aggressive lifelong struggle to cultivate a plain, unreflective, “anti-poetic,” contemporary-sounding, patently New World voice continues to influence American poetry far more than Stevens ever did—who pointed out that, in the last analysis, readers are drawn to Stevens’ work not by his ideas but by the beauty of the language in which he expresses them; by, that is, the sheer music of his lines. It is, alas, a species of music that Williams himself fought against successfully—and that is, largely as a result of that effort, notable in most of the American poetry of our own day only by its near-total absence. Paradoxical though it may seem, in short, Stevens, while widely recognized as the greatest of them all, has not had anywhere near the impact on his successors that his inferiors did—which goes a long way toward explaining why American poetry today is so much less than it was, and than it might be.

user-inactivated:

Probably the last American (non-musician) poet who had style.

    She measured to the hour its solitude.

    She was the single artificer of the world

    In which she sang. And when she sang, the sea,

    Whatever self it had, became the self

    That was her song, for she was the maker. Then we,

    As we beheld her striding there alone,

    Knew that there never was a world for her

    Except the one she sang and, singing, made.

This stanza flows.

http://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/43431


posted 2882 days ago