kleinbl00: I knew the Tucker was an utter dog, but I had no idea.
That. That is not a good idea.
The engine block would also feature brass cylinder sleeves, and would even use a magnesium oil pan to reduce acidity in the crankcase oil.
Yes please may I have reactive components in my car? If I have a choice, I'd like them to be somewhere maintenance is a royal bitch.
Tucker had promised 150 hp (110 kW; 150 PS), but his innovative engine was not working out. The valve train proved problematic and the engine only produced approximately 88 hp (66 kW). The high oil pressure required a 24-volt electrical system, up to 60 volts to get it started, and a long cranking time at start-up. Additionally, the oil pressure required to maintain valve function was not achieved until the engine was turning at higher RPMs and Tucker's engineers struggled with keeping the valve train working at idle and lower speeds/RPMs.
Yeah, when a Cessna 172 has you licked for power at half the displacement, it's time to quit.
Tucker is one of those companies adored by people who not only want to stick it to the man, but think those carburetor converter ads in the back of Popular Mechanics aren't a scam.
edit hubski "jpg" embeds an image but "JPG" does not.