Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect
Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray’s case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the “wet streets cause rain” stories. Paper’s full of them.
In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.
Mentioned here:
There-Must-Be-A-Pony Effect
Nobody Knows the Future
NOBODY KNOWS THE FUTURE.
Now, this is not new information. It was Mark Twain who said, “I’ve seen a heap of trouble in my life, and most of it never came to pass.”
Crisisization
The Punditic Thrust
Don't Believe Michael Crichton Either
This report is worth a look, but Crichton ought to have noticed that “The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or UCAR.”
That's not so bad, but ...
But who is worried? Nobody. Who is raising a call to action? Nobody. Why not? Because there is nothing to be done.
The magnetic field keeps the atmosphere in place? Uh, can I get a citation? The reduction is worrysome, but I am trusting am_Unition on this one, everything will work out okay somehow.
The big idea I get is that science is hard, seeing reality as it is takes work, but it can be done. It just takes a lot of clicking and reading to get (closer) to the bottom of things.
You can pay an academic to say whatever you want.
There is no science in economics.
Outsourcing maintenance compromises airline safety.
Paid family leave is good for workers.
Environmental regulation promotes cleaner water.
Racial bias is conspicuous in courtrooms.
Absence of government has been harmful to Somalia.
Minimum wage causes benefit and not harm.
Kids born rich fare better than poor kids who get an education. Bonus: Quiz
But who is worried? Nobody. Who is raising a call to action? Nobody. Why not? Because there is nothing to be done.
This was pretty comical, it reads not unlike the premise of one of my favorite worst high-budget science fiction films to date.
Long story short, yeah, the atmosphere is kept in place by the Earth's magnetic field, and here's what happens when your planet doesn't have a magnetic field. Like francopoli mentions in the resulting thread, this ain't the first time the field has flipped. Apparently nobody told Mikey. It generally happens every million years-ish, so if Earth's 4 billion years old, it's happened roughly thousands of times. For more details, see the thread.
So is there cause for concern on the subject? Yes and no. Things will change, but any engineering challenges presented by the lack of a strong dipole magnetic field aren't immediate enough to raise any alarm bells from where I'm sitting. The timescale over which this will become a problem isn't as immediate as global warming, and perhaps more importantly, humans have not affected the process (unlike Anthropogenic global warming).
He was kinda right though, there's nothing we can do about the magnetic field. Except make shitty sci-fi that's tangentially related to the subject. And as everyone here knows, the reason why we raise such a racket about global warming is because there are practices we humans can adopt to curb it.
Edit: Also, I'd like to mention that I've never seen any analysis on the effects of magnetic field reversal on global temperature/climate. It's uhhh... it's a bit complicated.