DG: So you’re saying that even if we learn to live sustainably, we may still have serious poverty?

    KSR: Actually, 2312 is not so much a prediction of a future but rather a symbolic portrait of now. Poverty is mostly political in nature because the technological ability to create adequacy for all living humans exists in 2312 (as it does now) but it has never been made the “civilizational project.” In the symbolic sense, people have already begun a process of speciation, in that the most prosperous on Earth live on average decades longer than the poorest people, and can change gender to an extent. Instead, the main division between people is height. By dividing people into the “shorts” and the “talls,” I was alluding to the idea that we are becoming separate sub-species based on class. And by describing how the “shorts” have many advantages, I was trying to point out that the assumption that bigger is better is false in many situations.



user-inactivated:

He always leaves earth at its current tradgetory. People still live there in miserable conditions, as a control group. Most of the progress on earth is held back by political, and economic problems.


posted 3156 days ago