Just me, mk, but...

Whilst I can filter useless, spammy feeds on Hubski and even when I do stumble across them can instantly recognise their lack by the lack of updots, the Hose neither filters nor does it distinguish for its followers between content, style, age or worth of any content.

So to the uninitiated, this list looks like a regular and equally valued set of posts from Hubski:

If it were me, I'd skip adding posts to the Hose from members who have been registered for less than 24 hours.

Actually, if it were me, I'd selfishly add a new feature which would let me filter posts that had been mutually filtered by any more than X of the people I already follow (and therefore trust). An extra checkbox: community filter. A database and logic hit building the feed? Community filtering a slippery slope?

And curate the Hose in a similar manner. More tricky, that, though, and more likely to attract accusations of censorship or provide opportunities for abuse maybe.

mk:

Right now, I toss them into globally filtered as I see them, but I am not always vigilant. Once in globally filtered, they are removed from the hose.

There is, however, an option to see globally filtered posts in settings.

Perhaps I should start following #spam. We aren't going to be able to get away with this approach forever.


posted 3383 days ago