However, an article I recently coauthored with Brian J. Osoba, "Youth Gangs as Pseudo-Governments: Implications for Violent Crime," calls this conventional wisdom into question. Our analysis suggests not that gangs cause violence, but that violence causes gangs. In other words, gangs form in response to government's failure to protect youths against violence. The surprising implication of our insight is that efforts to reduce gang activity could actually increase violent crime.
Paper here
If we look at gangs as a necessity for folks that live a life that requires protection, then shouldn't the existence of gangs cause governance to find some way to provide a better alternative to gang life?